The Calvine UFO photograph – revealed

Read the full story of how I found the most famous UFO photo in the world in my exclusive story published by The Daily Mail here. And follow the breaking story over on UAPMedia UK.

After thirty years immersed in the world of UFOlogy I had grown cynical after viewing hundreds of unconvincing photographs and films.

Most were blurred, grainy and out-of-focus shots of what could have been frisbees, streetlamps or even seagulls.

But when retired RAF officer Craig Lindsay showed me the only surviving print of the Calvine UFO photo he had kept safe for more than three decades I knew I was looking at something exceptional.

The ‘best’ image from the six UFO photographs taken at Calvine in Scotland at approx 9pm on Saturday 4 August 1990 (with permission of Sheffield Hallam University/Craig Lindsay)

My quest for the truth behind this photograph began back in 2009 when I was curating the release of thousands of once secret MoD UFO documents at The National Archives.

One of the files contained a poor-quality photocopied drawing of a UFO with a Harrier beside it, produced by the RAF’s photographic experts in 1990.

There was also a briefing prepared for Defence ministers in Margaret Thatcher’s government should they need to answer questions when the story broke in the Press.

Yet it never did and the file revealed nothing more about the photograph or the man who took it.

As an investigative journalist this mystery was too intriguing to ignore.

Little did I know then, however, that it was soon to become the longest and most frustrating investigation I have ever conducted. In the summer of 2021 I published the results of research in my Calvine case file update.

But even now, one year later and with one of the original missing photograph found, many questions still remain unanswered.

Former RAF Press Officer Craig Lindsay holds a first generation print of the Calvine UFO in May 2022 (Image Copyright David Clarke 2022)

Wherever I searched for answers, I found insiders blocking my inquiries.

For example, the MoD and The National Archives have refused to remove the black ink that covers the name of the photographer in the Calvine file, claiming it would be an intrusion into his privacy.

Yet in 1990, within days of his sighting, this man had sent his negatives and personal details to Scotland’s best-selling tabloid, so he was not shy of publicity at that time.

Even more baffling no one at The Daily Record remembered the story clearly or could explain what had become of the negatives that remain missing to this day.

A week spent knocking on doors in Pitlochry, the nearest tourist town to Calvine and gateway to the Scottish Highlands, also failed to develop any new leads.

Inquiries at the hotels where I knew the two young witnesses had worked likewise drew a blank. No one remembered the story or had even heard rumours about it.

Had the original story been spiked by a D-Notice, a gagging order based on national security concerns, served on the newspaper by the MoD?

While this might sound like something from TV’s The X-Files research by UFOlogist Matthew Illsley revealed that the Record’s editor, the late Endell Laird, had been a member of the MoD’s D-Notice committee at the time.

The original envelope that was used by the Daily Record to send the UFO image to the RAF in 1990
(Image copyright David Clarke 2022)

Was this just a coincidence?

And is there a link between the date of the sighting and the invasion of Kuwait by Iraqi forces that happened two days before the Calvine incident?

Thirteen years and many dead ends later a lucky break led me to call Craig Lindsay who, it turned out, had kept a genuine, first-generation print of the ‘best’ photograph.

He said: ‘I have been waiting more than 30 years for someone to call me about this story…and you are the first person to do so.’

In his own words, it is ‘either an extremely clever hoax or it shows “the real thing”’

But if it is ‘the real thing’ was the craft built by humans in a secret hangar somewhere on Area 51?

Or could it have come here from another planet?

Ex-MoD desk officer turned UFO pundit Nick Pope has described the Calvine image as ‘the most spectacular UFO photo ever sent to the Ministry of Defence’.

But could it be a very elaborate fake? Expert photographic analysis by my colleague Andrew Robinson, senior lecturer in photography at Sheffield Hallam University, suggests not.

He says: ‘My conclusion is that the object is definitely in front of the camera, i.e. it’s not a fake produced in post production, and its placement within the scene appears to be approximately halfway between the foreground fence and the [Harrier jet] in the background.

‘Could this be a kite or a radio controlled model? It could be but it would have to be a very large kite/model, at least 20-30m [65-98 ft] long if not longer’

In June 2021 the Pentagon released its long-awaited report on what it now calls UAPs or unidentified aerial phenomena after a spate of similar sightings and footage taken by US Navy pilots.

The new US UAP Task Force listed five identified categories that most sightings, when resolved, are likely to fall into. One of these is ‘classified programs’ developed by the US government.

The report says ‘we were unable to confirm, however, that these systems accounted for any of the UAP reports we collected’.

When I last published an update on this story I concluded it must be a hoax. But now I am convinced the Calvine UFO photograph shows one of these US classified ‘Black Project’ programs.

There is evidence that the Americans, and possibly also the British government, have found it useful to ‘keep the UFOs flying’ because they provide a useful cover for their own covert military activities.

View from Struan Point near Calvine, Perthshire, showing the wire fence and overhanging trees.
This is the location where we believe the photograph was taken in 1990 (Image Copyright Giles Stevens 2022).

But in this case their cover was blown by two young men who were in the wrong place at the wrong time.

The Ministry of Defence must now explain to the public why, if there are no such things as UFOs, how they can justify keeping their identities secret for a further 54 years.

And MoD also should explain what happened to the negatives and their file on this case – otherwise they are simply adding further grist to the mill of the conspiracy theorists who believe the authorities are hiding ‘the truth’ about visits to Earth by aliens.

I am open-minded about the possibility that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe. But I remain unconvinced that it has ever visited Earth.

The Calvine UFO photograph is in my opinion the best image of an unidentified flying object ever taken.

But as Dr J Allen Hynek, consultant to the USAF’s former UFO Project Blue Book once said, ‘unidentified to whom?’

Note: the original Calvine print and related documents were donated to my legend archive at Sheffield Hallam University Library Special Collections in July 2022.

Copyright David Clarke 2022

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to The Calvine UFO photograph – revealed

  1. chopperlad says:

    Chatted with Craig by phone, November 2017. He told me that photo was ‘somewhere in his garage’ ! (He’d shown it to me in 1994 and I was curious if he still had it !) I think now he was being a bit ‘cagey’ (due OSA) and knew exactly when he’d kept it !

    Well done for winkling it out !

  2. chopperlad says:

    What Craig didn’t know was that when he showed me the photo in 1994, in my office at Wattisham, he’d gone out to the loo and I took a photocopy.

    (A few weeks later I had a bit of a ‘panic’ (due OSA) and destroyed my copy ! ….. Years later, when that amazing photo never appeared in public, I wished I’d kept that copy!)

    However I’m really glad the mystery (at least of the photo) has now been revealed by you !

  3. Marc Davies says:

    All fascinating stuff and great detective work ! I agree that this I some sort of military device and it will be interesting to see where all this goes next . I’m still puzzled why the two witnesses have never come forward , maybe they will now . Now I’m not a conspiracy theorist and I do consider myself an open minded sceptic, but it does occur to me that if the object in the photo was inclined vertically then it would look remarkably like the “ufo” reported by the witnesses in the infamous Cash Landrum incident…..best wishes , Marc Davies .

  4. Lucy B says:

    Wow! My partner and I never thought an original photo would come to light. Thank you for all your hard work. Whatever it truly is, it is a shame that the public are not being told the truth.
    I saw my first UFO aged 15 in the 1970’s and I’m still left wondering.

  5. Charles w says:

    Just listened to your interview on The Unexplained. What an amazing photo. Thanks for your research.

  6. bshistorian says:

    I don’t find the secret military aircraft explanation any more compelling than the extra-terrestrial one – both would require technology significantly beyond what we had in the 90s. Magic, basically. Maybe some sort of lighter-than-air craft, I suppose.

  7. Cary Auguste says:

    It would be nice to bring in a Harrier and a blimp for size comparison.

  8. LeifFraNorden says:

    We’ve studied the Robinson report, and there are things that leave us extremely skeptical. Andrew Robinson’s photographic analysis pretty much eliminates the chance of photo manipulation, but there is a real chance we’re seeing model photography.* Robinson’s bases his size estimates (p10) on the dimensions of a Harrier, but if the ‘Harrier’ were a model suspended from a filament, the UFO would not have to be large at all.

    The film used– Ilford XP-1– could be shot at a slow speed (ISO 50), allowing both long exposure and shallow depth of field. This would facilitate the blur from the ‘Harrier’ motion, the varying foci on the tree branches, ‘elephant’ and jet, and the overall slight blur on the image.

    An handwritten incident report provided by via The Black Vault** states: ‘Description: Large diamond shaped UFO hovering for about 10 minutes before ascending vertically upwards at high speed. During sighting RAF aircraft believed to be a Harrier made a number of passes for 5 to 6 minutes before disappearing off.’ A scenario with one moving object would be easier to fake than a scenario with two, where a hoaxer might have to account for plausible trajectories in a photo sequence.

    There is an utter lack of corroboration. Nobody else saw the thing, no pilot has stepped forward, and nothing in the photo gives a sense of location. A Ministry of Defense memorandum states: ‘It has also been confirmed that there is no record of Harriers operating in the area at the time at which the photographs are alleged to have been taken.’ and ‘No other reports received by MoD of unusual air activity or sightings at location/date/time.’

    Curiously enough the Scottish Daily Record and the Ministry of Defense seemed entirely uncurious. If we held negatives of the ‘ best image of an unidentified flying object ever taken’, the first thing we would do is make copies. Neither the newspaper nor the MoD thought this worthwhile.

    The Scottish Daily Record is a tabloid and in 1990, in a circulation war with the Scottish edition of The Sun. If the former found the photos and the source at all credible, what are the chances they would bury the story?

    Even so, we our congratulations on finding the photos. We really enjoy your blog!

    *We credit Wim van Utrecht for this idea.
    (https://www.dropbox.com/s/sr85cnmlkbjtjzw/The%20Calvine%20UFO%20Photo%20-%20A%20Christmas%20Star_.pdf)

    ** https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/about/freedom-of-information/information-requests/1990-calvine-ufo-incident/ pp27-29

    • Entirely agree with all the points you make here…they are all the same questions I have been asking during the course of the 13 years.
      As for the Daily Record the fact is that a number of staff members do remember the story and are equally baffled as to why the story was not used. Even if the images had been exposed as fakes, that would not stop a newspaper from publishing the story – exactly the opposite. As you recognise, it’s a good story regardless of whether the images are faked – even more so if they do show military technology of some kind.

  9. Steuart Campbell says:

    It could be a model hanging from the tree, luckily with a genuine aircraft in background, perhaps deliberately posed.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.