100 years of Fake News: The German Corpse Factory


Corpse Factory cartoon drawn by Captain Bruce Bairnsfather, creator of ‘Old Bill’

False stories that masquerade as real news are not a product of the modern age. But few realise the modern era of ‘Fake News‘ began one hundred years ago – during the carnage of the First World War.

In the spring of 1917 some of Britain’s most influential newspapers published stories about the German Corpse Factory – a fake news story has been called ‘the master hoax’ and ‘the most appalling atrocity story’ of the 1914-18 conflict.

Listen to my interview on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme (17 February 2017) here – marking 100 years since the birth of the Corpse Factory legend. 

After three years of war and an Allied naval blockade, Germany was desperately short of some of the most basic materials that were needed for its manufacturing industry. Meanwhile, Britain was plotting to bring China into the war against Germany.

In March the English-language North China Herald claimed the country’s president had been horrified when a visiting German admiral boasted the Kaiser’s forces were ‘extracting glycerine out of dead soldiers’.

Rumours had been circulating since 1915, both in France and on the Home Front, that German war dead were being converted into munitions, animal feed and soap.

As one soldier put it ‘then other folk eat the pigs and poultry, so you may say it’s cannibalism. Fritz calls his margarine “corpse fat” because they suspect that’s what it comes from.’

But until 1917 these stories had not been presented as facts by any official source in the Allied countries.  That was until Lord Northcliffe’s  press empire amplified the gruesome claims and printed accounts from sources who claimed to have visited the Kadaververwertungsansatalt (‘Corpse-Utilisation Factory’).

A;lfred Harmsworth, 1st Viscount Northcliffe, owner of The Times and Daily Mail in 1917 (credit: Wikipedia)

Alfred Harmsworth, 1st Viscount Northcliffe, owner of The Times and Daily Mail in 1917 (credit: Wikipedia)

Lord Northcliffe’s anti-German vitriol had so much impact that he was offered the post of director of propaganda by the Prime Minister, David Lloyd George. On 17 April 1917 two of his papers, The Times and the Daily Mail published what they claimed was convincing evidence the German Army were using a gruesome ‘corpse factory’  behind their front line.

The Times ran the story under the headline Germans and their Dead, attributing the claim to two sources – a Belgian newspaper published in England and a story that originally appeared in a German newspaper, Berliner Lokalanzeiger.

The latter was a short account by reporter Karl Rosner who described an unpleasant smell ‘as if lime was being burnt’ as he passed the a factory behind the German lines. He said the fats that were rendered there were turned into lubricating oils and manure, adding ‘nothing can be permitted to go to waste’.

Rosner used the word Kadaver, that referred to the bodies of animals – mainly horses and mules – not human bodies.

But the Daily Mail described this as a ‘callous admission’ by the Germans that the factory was for ‘extracting oils, fats and pig-food from the bodies of German private soldiers killed in battle’.

The Times quoted an anonymous account from a Belgian source who said bodies arrived at the plant on trains where they were unloaded by workers who ‘wear oilskin overalls and masks with mica eyepieces’.

extract from a report on the Hun 'corpse factory' published by The Times in April 1917

extract from a report on the Hun ‘corpse factory’ published by The Times in April 1917

Long hooked poles were used to ‘push the bundles of bodies to an endless chain, which picks them with big hooks…The bodies are transported on this endless chain into a long, narrow compartment, where they pass through a bath which disinfects them. They then go through a drying chamber, and finally are carried into a digester or great cauldron, in which they are dropped by an apparatus …In the digester they remain for six to eight hours, and are treated by steam, which breaks them up while they are slowly stirred by machinery’.

Soon afterwards the Daily Express weighed in with a story that accused the Germans of cannibalism. The paper claimed the Corpse-Utilisation Works or ‘fat farm’, as it was known by German soldiers, was established soon after the slaughter on the Somme in 1916.

‘Some people believe that there is only one German factory for this damnable work out of which Germans are making handsome dividends,’ it claimed. ‘This is not so. The factories are established in each army area, including Rumania. This the Germans have admitted’.

A cartoon published by Punch presented the story under the caption “CANNON FODDER – AND AFTER”. It shows the German emperor addressing a new recruit: ‘…and don’t forget that your Kaiser will find a use for you – alive or dead’.

The German government protested against what they called ‘loathsome and ridiculous’ claims they said were the result of a deliberate mis-translation of the German word Kadaver.

But their protests fell on deaf ears as both the Chinese ambassador and the Maharajah of Biikanir issued public expressions of horror at German treatment of their dead, the latter warning if the bodies of Indian soldiers were treated in this way this’ would be regarded as an atrocity that would never be forgotten or forgiven.’

Punch cartoon from April 1917.

Punch cartoon from April 1917.

In Parliament, responding to questions from MPs, Lord Robert Cecil, Under Secretary of State at the Foreign Office, said: ‘in view of other actions by the German military authorities there is nothing incredible in the present charge against them.’

But the German Corpse Factory did not exist. It was propaganda – designed to demonise the Germans and entice the Chinese to join the Allied forces. Propaganda always involves some form of deception, ‘whether through outright lying, omission of important information, distortion or misdirection’, according to Professor Piers Robinson of the University of Sheffield.

Some historians have blamed the Northcliffe newspapers for spreading this most false of WW1 fake news stories. But until now no one has been able to find conclusive proof that would settle the mystery of who created the story and set it running.

In 1928 Labour MP Arthur Ponsonby, in his book Falsehood in Wartime, pointed the finger of blame at the British government and their friends in the press who, he claimed, had both ’encouraged and connived’ in spreading the lie across the world.

For its part, the government failed to issue a complete denial until 1925 when Sir Austen Chamberlain admitted, in a Commons statement, there was ‘never any foundation’ for what he called ‘this false report’.

But in the same year the Conservative MP John Charteris, who as a Brigadier General had served as head of intelligence under Douglas Haig during the war, whilst on a lecture tour of the USA, reportedly admitted he had fabricated the story.

The Daily Express weighs in with its own 'corpse factory' propaganda, April 1917

The Daily Express weighs in with its own ‘corpse factory’ propaganda, April 1917

The New York Times revealed how Charteris, at a private dinner, confessed to having transposed captions from one of two photographs found on captured German soldiers. One showed a train taking dead horses to be rendered, the other showed a train taking dead soldiers for burial. The photo of the horses had the word ‘cadaver’ written upon it and Charteris ‘had the caption transposed to the picture showing the German dead, and had the photograph sent to a Chinese newspaper in Shanghai.’

The story was planted in the full knowledge that it would be followed up by European newspapers and generate horror and anti-German feelings.

On his return to Britain Charteris denied making the remarks and, since that time, no one has been able to discover the photographs or any paper-trail that would prove the intelligence services connived with the press to promote the corpse factory lie.

But I found what I believe to be one of the photographs in Foreign Office documents at The National Archives in Kew. The black and white image, dated 17 September 1917, clearly shows bodies of German soldiers, tied in bundles, on a train just as Charteris had described in 1925.

The covering letter, from a MI7 officer at Whitehall, is addressed to the Director of Information, Lt Col John Buchan, author of The Thirty-Nine Steps (1915). It offers ‘a photograph of Kadavers, forwarded by General Charteris for propaganda purposes’.

One of the captured German photographs used by MI7 for propaganda in 1917 (credit: The National Archives)

One of the captured German photographs showing ‘kadavers’ that were sent to British intelligence for potential use as propaganda in 1917 (Crown Copyright – The National Archives)

MI7 were a military intelligence branch that specialised in anti-German propaganda in neutral countries. From 1916 its recruits were busily writing corpse factory pamphlets for translation into a number of foreign languages for distribution in Europe and the Far East.  The branch was disbanded in 1918 because its work had been accomplished and according to one historian its records were destroyed on the grounds they could have been incriminating.

But we know that in 1917 MI7 employed 13 officers and 25 paid writers, some whom moonlighted as ‘special correspondents’ for national newspapers.  One of their most talented writers was Major Hugh Pollard who combined his secret work with the role of special correspondent for the Daily Express, whose proprietor, Lord Beaverbrook, became Minister of Information in 1918.

A 'corpse factory' story from the regional press

A ‘corpse factory’ story from the regional press

After the war Pollard confessed his role to his cousin, Ivor Montague, who writing in 1970, recalled

‘…how we laughed at his cleverness when he told us how his department had launched the account of the German corpse factories and of how the Hun was using the myriads of trench-war casualties for making soap and margarine. He explained that he had originally thought up the idea himself to discredit the enemy among the populations of Oriental countries, hoping to play upon the respect for the dead that goes with ancestor-worship. To the surprise of the authorities it had caught on, and they were now making propaganda out of it everywhere…the tears ran down his cheeks as he told us the story they had circulated of a consignment of soap from Germany arriving in Holland and being buried with full military honours. But even for us, the taste of some of his tales began to grow sour after he became a Black and Tan.’

For those who spread fake news in 1917 the Germans were so evil that anything could be used as a weapon against them – including rumours and lies. But lies have consequences. During the 1930s the corpse factory was used by the Nazis as proof of British perfidy during the Great War.

Historians Joachim Neander and Randal Marlin remind us how these false stories ‘encouraged later disbelief when early reports circulated about the Holocaust under Hitler, thus contributing to the early lack of response by nations asked to accept Jewish refugees’.

An edited version of this blogpost can be found on the BBC News website here. Social media coverage of the Corpse Factory story can be followed on Storify here..


This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to 100 years of Fake News: The German Corpse Factory

  1. Kevin Little says:

    Just heard you on Radio 5 …Brilliant and educational. Thank you!

  2. busterggi says:

    Fake news began 100 years ago??

    I take it you’ve never heard of the Great Moon Hoax.

  3. Filip Graliński says:

    In a grim irony of history, Germans did try to produce soap from human fat during World War II, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Spanner

  4. Dan says:

    And the Daily Mail continues to this day to print a load of old cobblers! I’m sure it’s deceased owner would be gratuitously chortling away in his grave!

  5. randalmarlin says:

    There had been rumors of the Corpse Factory story prior to April 17, 1917, but what made them credible was the supposed authentication by the German authorities themselves.The report by Karl Rosner for the Lokal-Anzeiger (a semi-official newspaper) dated April 10, 1917 gave British and Belgian propagandists the opportunity to give credence to their fictional, supposed eyewitness account from inside such a factory. Lord Northcliffe’s papers (The Times, The Daily Mail) simply juxtaposed the propaganda account with a mistranslation of Rosner’s account, giving the impression that both referred to the same Corpse Factory.
    What needs to be added is that there was an additional mistranslation regarding the German word “Leim.” Rosner is supposed to have said that he detected the smell of burning lime. But the word Leim in German means “glue.” A proper translation would have referred to the smell of boiling glue. That would have tipped readers off to the use of horses. By translating “Leim” as “lime” readers would have thought of quicklime used on copses as a disinfectant.

    Joachim Neander has a well-researched book about the world-wide dissemination of this hoax: “The German Corpse Factory. The Master Hoax of British Propaganda in the First World War” (Saarland University Press, 2013).
    There’s also my book, “Propaganda and the Ethics of Persuasion,” Second Edition (Broadview Press, 2013) which includes the “Leim” reference. Your own account has valuable additional information.

    • Thanks Randal – there is a new book on the Corpse Factory by Stephen Badsley, of the University of Wolverhampton, due for publication later this year. I understand this will contain much new information and primary source material relating to the story.

  6. John Sawyer says:

    Just as Nazi Germany pointed to the fake news about WWI German corpse factories to try to claim innocence when true reports began to circulate years later that they were ramping up mass slaughter leading up to and during WWII, the Trump administration in the US seizes on any mistake by the media to claim that ALL bad news about the administration must be fake.

  7. Dr. Joachim Neander says:

    If someone is interested in my book about the Corpse Factory hoax – it is available for free on the Web, because Saarland University Press puts all publications in the public domain:

    Click to access Komplettausgabe_tgBeiheft6.pdf

    By the way, the Spanner story from Wikipedia is also 98 per cent fictitious.
    I hope to be able to publish about it in the near future.
    Those who want to contact me should try to do this via Dr. Clarke.
    I am always open for criticism and discussions.

  8. AJP says:

    I’m curious why so few academics chose to describe the modern wag the dog hoaxes. For instance. Nayirah al-Ṣabaḥ (Arabic: نيره الصباح‎), called “Nurse Nayirah” in the media, was a fifteen-year-old Kuwaiti girl, who alleged that she had witnessed the murder of infant children by Iraqi soldiers in Kuwait, in verbal testimony to the U.S. Congress, in the run up to the 1991 Gulf War. Her testimony, which was regarded as credible at the time, has since come to be regarded as wartime propaganda. The public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, which was in the employ of Citizens for a Free Kuwait, had arranged the testimony. Nayirah’s testimony was widely publicized. Hill & Knowlton, which had filmed the hearing, sent out a video news release to Medialink, a firm which served about 700 television stations in the United States. That night, portions of the testimony aired on ABC’s Nightline and NBC Nightly News reaching an estimated audience between 35 and 53 million Americans. Seven senators cited Nayirah’s testimony in their speeches backing the use of force. President George Bush repeated the story at least ten times in the following weeks.

    She gave a wonderful performance. Oscar worthy. It’s not always yellow cake or gulf of tonkin and 40 minute warning for fake WMDs that the mainstream media constantly publish without any…..any question of doubt. This happens pretty much in every war. They are all built on lies. The modus operandi never changes. We now have the Assad barrel bomb attacks. Alleged barrel bomb attacks. The BBC put up on their websites a little girl called Masa describing the barrel bomb that landed on her house. Call me heartless but I don’t believe a word our media bodies claim. Nothing has changed. Nothing.

  9. Brian Dunning says:

    Was reading this thinking “This was a John Charteris special, wasn’t it?” and then boom, there’s his name. He came up with quite a few favorites. Even kickstarted the Angel of Mons…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.